The five
          preludes are short, most one page each, highly technical,
          and more like etudes than preludes. All, except the last
          begin tonal and end tonal with many chromatic
          explorations in between, a procedure Wallingford Riegger
          later described as ‘tempered atonality.’ Each
          has a distinctive texture generated by one or two musical
          ideas….Fine’s compositional technique has
          become dramatic and terse, due, perhaps, to more command
          over a restricted use of ideas and more freedom of
          expression through her work with dancers.
          –Heidi Von Gunden, 
			The Music of Vivian Fine, Scarecrow Press,
          1999
           
          Though Fine considered these works among her finest piano
          pieces, Five Preludes was not officially premiered until
          1962, when pianist Robert Guralnik performed them in New
          York City.  
      The Preludes are
          a set of five individual studies that bridge Fine’s
          early atonal and subsequent tonal period. Each prelude
          exploits a different musical element, explores
          consonances and dissonances, and conclusively resolves to
          a major chord. Its is as if Fine were simultaneously
          struggling to maintain her strong atonal connections and
          attempting to move in the direction of tonality
               The first prelude,
          suggesting C major, features chromaticism and major and
          minor thirds presented in a recurring sixteenth-note
          pattern. The opening measure, with this motive of
          sixteenth-note thirds, immediately presents key
          ambiguity: A minor or C major?
               Each presentation of the
          motive retains this sense of tonal ambiguity until the
          final measure, where Fine resolves the question of key by
          concluding with a simple C octave. Although the final C
          octave does not contain the third and fifth of a C major
          chord, I suggest the prelude’s key is C major
          because the opening and recurring motive of thirds
          contains the tonic and missing third.
               In addition to the
          chromaticism used in the motivic thirds, Fine writes a
          series of chromatic octaves and single line chromatic
          passages throughout the prelude. Although the tonality of
          the piece is continually questionable, one feels a sense
          of cohesiveness and a less harsh dissonant quality than
          the solo piano work from her first style period (Four
          Polyphonic Pieces), due to the frequent interjections of
          the opening motive’s major and minor thirds.
               The second prelude, marked
          adagio calmato, captures the “wonderfully lyric
          quality” of which Zuponcic speaks. With this
          prelude, Fine explores a more homophonic style of writing
          than she previously used in earlier solo piano works,
          presenting a lyric melody with a traditionally classical
          left-hand accompaniment. The piece begins and ends in
          E-flat major, yet few other segments present the key as
          clearly. An influence of jazz harmonies may be noted in
          this prelude in its use of extended and altered
          chords.
               Rhythm and meter are two of
          the more interesting elements that Fine exploits in the
          third prelude. The beat continually shifts between eighth
          and sixteenth notes, and the first eight measures alone
          include five different meters: 3/8, 5/8, 6/8, 13/16, and
          4/8. The sixteenth note serves as the common unit between
          the meters, and sixteenth-note motion helps maintain an
          uninterrupted rhythmic and melodic flow.
               A lyrical melody,
          interspersed with long passages of flowing chromatic
          sixteenths, remains throughout in the right hand, but the
          left hand shows Fine’s continued affinity for
          linear writing. It serves alternately as accompaniment,
          countermelody, and harmonic (consonant and dissonant)
          complement. The prelude bears no key signature, but
          A-flat often appears at significant structural points and
          the final figure is an arpeggiated A-flat major
          chord.
               The octave, a consonant
          perfect interval, was rare in Fine’s earlier piano
          writing, but emerges as a significant interval in Five
          Preludes. The rising importance of octaves suggests,
          along with a prominent use of thirds) as seen
          particularly in the first prelude), Fine’s growing
          interest in consonant intervals, harmonies, and tonality.
          The first two preludes uses octaves intermittently;
          however, the fourth prelude prominently features them.
          Differing from the other, more lyrical preludes, this
          virtuosic prelude exhibits driving energy, a result of
          the octave’s exploitation and incisive
          articulation. Although Fine does not mark a key
          signature, the first two measures, which occur repeatedly
          in various guises, suggests D-flat major, as does the
          last octave-fifth: D-flat/A-flat.
               The last prelude of the set
          moves with the same driving energy initiated in the
          fourth prelude. Although this piece is not entitled
          “toccata,” its flashiness and rhythmic verve
          suggest this designation. Fine explores new techniques,
          such as bitonality and glissandi, in this prelude, but
          again chromaticism is the core of her writing. To create
          a toccata-like effect, Fine divides a chromatic line by
          alternating the pitches between the hands.
               The left hand has a key
          signature of G-flat major, while the right hand has none.
          Fine subtly focuses attention on the pentatonic nature of
          the left hand, and diverts attention from the chromatic
          framework. However, in the middle section of this ABA
          form, she abandons the pentatonic idiom for chromaticism.
          Fine changes the left hand’s key signature to no
          sharps or flats, yet she relies heavily on accidentals in
          both voices. She also reveals a melody hidden in the
          texture by double-stemming notes in the left hand,
          changing the dynamic marking dramatically (f to p), and
          indicating a change of mood to grazioso.
               To delineate the sections
          clearly, the transition measure (m. 31) contains the only
          pedal marking in the prelude, one of the two pedal
          indications of the entire set. The second A section
          replicates the first until the last two measures. Here
          Fine momentarily sets up a half-step conflict between D
          and D-flat before concluding with a black-key glissando
          in both hands, and a final G-flat major chord.
               Perhaps the greatest
          similarity between the preludes is the triadic or tonal
          conclusion to each. Despite a degree of tonal meandering
          in these preludes, Fine always concludes with a
          nonambiguous ending as if to solidify her tonal
          intentions. With the preludes, her writing becomes more
          lyric and homophonic, although she never completely
          disregards her linear interest.
          –Leslie Jones, “The Solo Piano
          Music of Vivian Fine,” Doctor of musical arts
          thesis, University of Cincinnatti, 1994.