In November
and December Fine wrote an ambitious piece, Trio in
Three movements for Violin, Viola and Violoncello
(1930). The Trio shows how rapidly Fine was
mastering compositional techniques. Naturally, in
comparison to Solo for Oboe and the Four
Pieces for Two Flutes, the Trio is thicker,
but it also has more interesting rhythms, such as
quintuplets and polyrhythms of five against four and four
against three. Interestingly, Crawford had written
suggesting that Fine practice scales in counter-rhythms,
two against three, three against four, two against five,
and so on, while paying attention to interesting
off-accents that occur. Perhaps Fine was realizing
Crawford’s suggestions in the Trio.
The form becomes more
defined, as is apparent in the third movement’s
rondo. Material is shaped by motivic patterns that appear
throughout the various counterpoints. In the first
movement, these patterns are meant to be recognized
because the opening six measures are heard in unison
before a three-part texture begins in measure 9. Soon the
texture thickens, and the motifs in the cello are
counterpointed with a prominent viola melody with
brackets to indicate a haupt motif and accompanimental
figures in the first violin.
There are several double
stops, and at this time Fine did now have access to
string players other than [her sister] Adelaide, so Fine
imagined what Trio would sound like. She did
look at scores by Hindemith and Schoenberg for ideas.
Contrast among the instruments is marked by changes in
dynamic markings, labeling of solo passages, and
haupt motifs (indicated with brackets), which
are shorter and more energetic material that that used in
previous pieces. One suspects that the bracketing was
probably influenced by her study of Schoenberg’s
scores.
The second movement, titled
“Intermezzo,” is a beautiful melody
accompanied by a cello pizzicato ostinato. Later the
melody is fragmented, passed among the instruments, heard
doubled at the major seventh, and decorated before
returning to a short recapitulation. “Rondo,”
which is an attacca from the second movement, has a
spirited motivic A section, a slower and more lyrical B
section, and an imitative C section. The rondo pattern is
not proportional – the second A is a three-measure
remembrance of the original material; the C section is
long and developmental; and the closing A is the same
length and the original but, as is her custom, is not an
exact repetition. With this movement Fine is moving
closer to more sophisticated writing. Material is
recombined, echoed, and varied, and ideas are
juxtaposed.
–Heidi Von Gunden,
The Music of Vivian Fine, Scarecrow Press,
1999