In November
          and December Fine wrote an ambitious piece, Trio in
          Three movements for Violin, Viola and Violoncello
          (1930). The Trio shows how rapidly Fine was
          mastering compositional techniques. Naturally, in
          comparison to Solo for Oboe and the Four
          Pieces for Two Flutes, the Trio is thicker,
          but it also has more interesting rhythms, such as
          quintuplets and polyrhythms of five against four and four
          against three. Interestingly, Crawford had written
          suggesting that Fine practice scales in counter-rhythms,
          two against three, three against four, two against five,
          and so on, while paying attention to interesting
          off-accents that occur. Perhaps Fine was realizing
          Crawford’s suggestions in the Trio.
               The form becomes more
          defined, as is apparent in the third movement’s
          rondo. Material is shaped by motivic patterns that appear
          throughout the various counterpoints. In the first
          movement, these patterns are meant to be recognized
          because the opening six measures are heard in unison
          before a three-part texture begins in measure 9. Soon the
          texture thickens, and the motifs in the cello are
          counterpointed with a prominent viola melody with
          brackets to indicate a haupt motif and accompanimental
          figures in the first violin.
               There are several double
          stops, and at this time Fine did now have access to
          string players other than [her sister] Adelaide, so Fine
          imagined what Trio would sound like. She did
          look at scores by Hindemith and Schoenberg for ideas.
          Contrast among the instruments is marked by changes in
          dynamic markings, labeling of solo passages, and
          haupt motifs (indicated with brackets), which
          are shorter and more energetic material that that used in
          previous pieces. One suspects that the bracketing was
          probably influenced by her study of Schoenberg’s
          scores.
               The second movement, titled
          “Intermezzo,” is a beautiful melody
          accompanied by a cello pizzicato ostinato. Later the
          melody is fragmented, passed among the instruments, heard
          doubled at the major seventh, and decorated before
          returning to a short recapitulation. “Rondo,”
          which is an attacca from the second movement, has a
          spirited motivic A section, a slower and more lyrical B
          section, and an imitative C section. The rondo pattern is
          not proportional – the second A is a three-measure
          remembrance of the original material; the C section is
          long and developmental; and the closing A is the same
          length and the original but, as is her custom, is not an
          exact repetition. With this movement Fine is moving
          closer to more sophisticated writing. Material is
          recombined, echoed, and varied, and ideas are
          juxtaposed.
          –Heidi Von Gunden, 
			The Music of Vivian Fine, Scarecrow Press,
          1999